Wednesday, December 13, 2006

What Women Want

Warning: This post has nothing to do with the movie of the same title. Nor does it provide a step by step analysis peering into a woman’s mind. Disappointing, I know. Sorry guys! Also feminist brigades can do well to keep off.

The idea of egalitarianism in our society is quite befuddling. I have often wondered, when we talk about women’s equality or equality of the castes, whether we actually mean equality in the absolute sense of the term or we actually provide them with crutches to “help” them feel equal. I see the latter being the order of the day and there is a supercilious air with which this equality is bestowed upon the “lesser” mortals subtly conveying that “you can never become equal without these crutches”.

What do you feel when you see seats in a public transport bus that say “Only for Ladies”? Does it mean “Ladies, we have tormented you for ages and now as a token of atonement we offer you reserved seats”? Does it mean “Women, you still are like weak dandelions that will get blown away by the fierce wind of a man’s world. So sit down and don’t hurt yourself”? Does it point out, “Females, the harsh reality is that we men are ill-mannered and cannot control the movements of our hands and our eyes. Hence in view of your own safety we suggest you sit down separately.”? I have come across seats reserved for the elderly and disabled persons in the buses in UK and even a special area for buggies but never seats reserved for women. So is this what we are really looked forward to as equity in our country?

The other day as I was taking the public transport to office, I did not find a seat while some blokes were occupying the seats meant for ladies. A lady, who herself was seated, started arguing with the men seated in the reserved section and pointed out to me as a victim of their incivility. She wanted me to join her Mahila Mukti Morcha Andolan and claim what was lawfully mine. I simply stood spectator. There was another incident where a friend of mine demanded that her colleague should be chivalrous enough to offer her his seat and reproached him for his thoughtlessness. It goes for all the acts of chivalry and many women outright demand it: we love to dump our heavy shopping bags on the men while our hands remain free to twirl our locks and adjust our makeup, we expect them to open the Bulund Darwazas for us while we make our regal entry like Queen Victorias (we could do with some applause as well), we demand that they draw our chairs out so we can place our fragile bottoms on those exquisite cushions at fluffy sounding restaurants and yet we’d like ourselves and the men around us to believe that we are superwomen! I am rather amused at the dichotomous stand that we women take on what we believe is equality and I surmise many men are quite bemused too. I am not too surprised that we do not get what we really need because we are not clear about it ourselves! We expect reservations right from seats in the buses, to engineering colleges to parliaments and yet we want to be judged on level playing field and be awarded promotions and raises at par with men. I do not have problems with engineering and medical colleges solely for women or the fact that women’s tennis is played as best of three instead of best of five. These cases accept that there are areas where women have niche skills even though nature has not endowed them with the physical prowess of men.

Breaking the proverbial glass ceiling has become an obsession for women’s lib brigades. Why don’t they accept that some women out of their own choice would like to quit their high profile careers to devote time for the family? Why are women, who choose to stay at home and become “mere” housewives, looked upon with derision for having “wasted their qualifications and professional degrees”? Isn’t liberation all about volition even if you choose the same path your grandma was forced to take? I think the most memorable scene in the movie Mona Lisa Smile is when Katherine Watson (Julia Roberts), a feminist arts professor at Wellesley women’s college, is shocked by her best student’s decision to settle into family life. Katherine did not realize that in her ambitious plans for her bright student she was treading on the latter’s right to choose family over career. Although the movie was very pro-feminist, it did not show either the career woman or the housewife as a winner or a loser. Instead it just questioned their ideologies. Perhaps it is time women just sat back and asked themselves what they really want rather than live life in one big blur of time and fighting the wrong battles in their lives.

16 comments:

Roshan R said...

I agree to a certain extent. You see, there is a lot of scope for improvement at any rate from us guys too, no doubt. Women do have to fight for equality.. its because years of ridiculous oppressive measures have left them in that state.. if only at the outset, it was clear to all, that both sexes are equal...now, reservations are needed just to show that women are given importance..and there's only 2 sexes, in the first place, for crying out loud, which tends to make it more hilarious!!!

Ravi said...

Nice post.. you write very well, Kirthi. I have never really understood or agreed with reserved seats. It irked me all my childhood when I traveled by bus. Here, in the US, there is reserved seating for the handicapped and elderly, which makes perfect sense. And chivalry is nice when not enforced, and that's the way it should remain. There, we grow up knowing that ladies have those first 5 rows reserved. May be it makes sense in those overcrowded and bulging buses. But it also helps generate a feeling of inequality in the minds of men and women alike, reiterating to them that at the bottom of it, there is no equality. Feminists continue to fight for it... male chauvinists continue to deliver lip service.

Anonymous said...

I have lived and worked in London and I always used the public transport there. I have also traveled extensively in Europe.
Seats aren't reserved on the buses or the tubes in UK or any other country in Europe coz there are frequent buses/tubes/trains that are not over-crowded. You get the 7:11 train if you miss your 7:10 train...People don't travel standing on one foot.
When the buses in our country (India) are soooooooo overcrowded(and lets accept the fact that women can't compete with men physically) and so infrequent (if you miss the 6:15 bus in a small town, unlike in metros you have to wait for the next couple of hours to get the next bus) as an independent professional woman (I neither apply make-up nor expect my boy friend to carry my shopping bag for me.. erm, I have short hair and so no twirling locks either...:).....)I definitely appreciate the fact that there are seats reserved for us.

Prashanth said...

Kirthi! After a long time... you've written a post I absolutely love!!

See, I always understood that caste reservation is there in reparation for past suppression and discrimination. But watching factions lobbying for the same thing for women always confused me. Why are they calling it "for the sake of equality" when it is clear that most women simply didn't want those positions, and among the ones who did, few were qualified? And on top of that, I noticed that when it comes to college seats and jobs and all, women with relatively lower qualifications are still considered, in order to maintain a certain ratio of the sexes in the workplace/study environment. No loud retorts please, this is perfectly true and you can check the facts - for ex. look up the CAT percentiles of people who got interview calls for the IIMs.

In other words, most women want the world to be more in their favor than it already is. This also explains the whole chivalry thing, by the way. Some one tried to explain to me why this ought to be acceptable to us: since women are still burdened with "house tasks" like cooking, cleaning, taking care of the children, etc., they can't spend as much time on their career as men do. So it's only fair that those things are made favourable for them.

Makes sense in a very convoluted way, even if I don't fully agree with it.

Prashanth said...

By the way, I watched Mona Lisa Smile twice... liked the movie a lot!

Kirthi said...

Rohan,

How can you undo years of oppression with petty reservations? The role of women themselves in stopping this oppression is being undermined in the process. Why are there still female infanticides (and mind u in educated families as well)? Less girls in schools? Because the home manager aka woman of the house doesn't take the bull by the horns and deal with the situation.

Ravi,

Thanks for dropping by.

Anony,

Yes I live in one of those cities with such horribly poor infrastructure that there is only one bus in two hours going to my workplace from the city. But I blame the f***ing corporation for poor infrastructure not the patriarchal society for making me stand in the bus. The funny thing is we have seats reserved for women and not one for the aged or the disabled: so what does that tell you? And about the silly hair twirling and make up it was meant to be sarcastic...

SP,

And YOU said You are a FEMINIST. Get outta here before people start laughing.
Haha, that logic says that a working guy who helps his wife out in the housework should also get some reserved seats in buses!

MOHIT JOSHI said...

Adam Smith (the famous economist) said about society like ours "The society which puts equality before freedom ends with neither". That's exactly what is happening here.

Btw, even though men are physically stronger women have used the powers at their disposal to achieve their goals, be it glory, power or simple shopping stock. One such great power of theirs has been power of seduction :) Remember Cleopatra?

Prashanth said...

Hello! I said I didn't agree with that theory! What exactly did you think I was aying anyway?

Anonymous said...

hi

......
.
...


.............
......................

:)

The Avenger !!! said...

super duper post kirthi, how i wish I could let one of those mahila mukti morcha activits to read this :)

Vinod R Iyer said...

And the argument continues ... !!

Glad to know that atleast one woman thinks this way. Reservations of any kind should go only to the disabled.Whether it is moneywise or healthwise.

Nice post.

Kirthi said...

Mohit,
Funny thing in humans isn't it? The women are supposed to the seducing part!!
I mean look at the animal world around us: The lioness is the bread winner, the female spider bigger than the male, the queen bee is mega-sized and mega-powerful,most male insects die after mating, the male birds have to dance and sing to seduce the female birds...what a turn around in the homo sapiens I must say!! If this is evolution, what next??

SP,
What were you trying to say?? That you are confused whether reservations/chivalry is right/wrong?

Vee,
Thanx for those dots.

Avenger,
Ahh, you want me panned again do you? Anyway I hope the warning wards them off!!

Vinod,
Thanks for dropping by.

Handful Of Hell said...

The men oppressed the women, so all the women deserve reservation.

The Jews oppressed Christians so lets have some reservations for the Christians

The British oppressed the Americans, so they deserve reservations too

The Africans were perpetually exploited, so throw something there as well

And the communists oppressed the Chinese so all the Chinese deserve reservation

And finally as you put all the pieces of the above jigsaw in place you will realize that all of us deserve reservation and rightfully so. We need to reserve our minds to think productively and move on to things of greater importance.

Peace

ankurindia said...

i treat men and women equally . no matter if the person is woman or man if she deserves respect she/he will get it ... ..all men/women are not good and all men/women are not bad . it does not matter if you are man or woman it depends on your nature /way you treat others that you deserve respect or any special favour or not .so i believe and strongly recommend equality for men and women

Lady of Musotopia said...

Another excellent blog post; you have a very articulate and eloquent style of writing, not to mention that it has managed to generate so much discussion :)
How long have they been having such buses (with seating reserved for women) in India? I have never heard of the concept. Down here, as with other aforementioned countries of the Western world, we have reserved seating on public transport for disabled persons, the elderly and pregnant - and for good reason. Out of those three categories there is only gender discrimination when another life form (or at least impending life form) is thrown into the mix. But with regard to general populations of men and women, there are still coexisting occurrences of both hostile sexism (“women seek to gain power by getting control over men”) and benevolent sexism (“women should be cherished and protected by men”). ‘Chivalry’ still exists, is seldom seen publicly and ‘modern etiquette’ is generally adopted (e.g. holding doors open for people behind you, helping someone pick up their accidentally-dropped papers), regardless of gender.
On a slightly different topic, it’s important not to forget that sexism can be a two-way occurrence. I believe that paternity leave has been introduced (at least over here) due to an increasing number of men taking on the responsibility of looking after their young children whilst their other halves return to work and also because they are still an important part of their children’s lives.

Mandeep Singh said...

hmm... great post ..
i kinda feel the same .. women themselves are responsible for their condition ..
but one thing which a frnd of mine once told me , she's a gal
"life is a bitch and men are dogs". . bow-wow..
ha ha im a man . :P
and u hv a great riting style ...
great blog u have ..
rawk on . . .

Take Care ..
God Bless Ya
manD
www.mandeepsingh.co.nr