In this extended weekend that I have had, I watched three movies: Crash, Wait until Dark and Hollywood Ending. Each one of them is brilliant in it’s own right. What connects the first two movies, in larger scheme of things, is the way our perceptions about the world around us get shattered every time we stereotype it.
“Crash”, for me resounded with this theme. Apart from the fact that it had too many coincidences (why do we pan only Hindi movies for them?) and too many characters, it was well made and well edited. For once, Hollywood quit being politically correct in depicting a backslapping black-white camaraderie and instead touched the layers of the American psyche (and here I mean across all races) that are quiet invisible to outsiders. It didn’t moralize and sermonize, just presented images and left the viewer to decide his interpretation of them.
"Wait until Dark", on the other hand, is an old thriller which is set in a mere two-room apartment. Again, one doesn’t expect a blind Audrey Hepburn to fight off three goons alone, well, neither did they when they planned their charade to fool her. It takes a creative director and an excellent script to keep the audience on the edge of their seats with a two-room set. Just goes to prove that you need “real” imagination to entertain, not obscenely obese snakes (Anaconda, Cobra, Python and perhaps Green-eyed Yellow banded Boa Constrictor) and bloody-faced dolls (Chucky 1, 2 right up to 43225).
“Crash” and “Wait Until Dark” do talk about expecting the unexpected and not judging people by their race, color or for that matter physical incapacities, but is that really possible in a world of 6 billion and counting? Why, the very basis of Carolus Linneus’ classification is grouping common characteristics. We could have argued with him that dog A and dog B are not to be put under the same genus because dog B is smart for he knows tricks but dog A is dumb. Mr. Linneus would then come back to us with a statistic saying that 73% of all dogs don’t know tricks and he would conclude that dogs are generally dumb (No offence pooches and Maneka Gandhi). I am not saying that we are planning to classify and remember characteristics of 6 billion people like we did to the animal and plant kingdom (ok I know there are 5 kingdoms)! The point is, human learning and knowledge stems from categorizations: wasn’t it easier to learn geography grouping the iron producing areas with the steel industries? This tendency to classify, stereotype and generalize gets rubbed off when we meet people too. We look for commonalities between one depraved personality and another and we tend to keep away from them. If nine out of ten terrorists happen to be Muslims we draw our conclusions about Islam. Where we actually go wrong is in inferring that every Muslim is terrorist: the case of every square being a rectangle and every rectangle not being a square! We confuse generalizations with blanket rules. I am all for generalizations: they give a broad idea about a personality, more like first impressions.
On a lighter note: Woody Allen’s "Hollywood Ending" was superb. For the benefit of those who haven’t seen it, it’s a story of an eccentric director (Woody as Val) who faces the vicissitude of Hollywood through his psycho-somatic blindness and ends up making his best film blind: of course it gets panned by all Hollywood critics. I hope for the sake of sanity and sense in Indian films that KANK bombs big time too. Of course I would never watch it even for free, like I didn’t watch Kal Ho Naa Ho. The Kekta Kapoor of 70 mm, Karan-Kreatively-bankrupt-Johar, thought he was breaking new ground in Indian cinema with a theme of divorce and infidelity! Well, here’s news for you Kkkkaran: stay home one afternoon with your mom/bajuwali aunty watching serials, you don’t need to overhear a couple break-up over a Koffee in Starbucks for your next script, try plastic surgery or amnesia. I know the movie is not going to bomb, as long as there are nut-case desi New Yorkers watching it after paying what could have been an orphan’s meal (oh yes at least pretend to weep about that)! After all like Val said in Hollywood ending, “I may be a bum here, but I am a hero there”. Val’s movie was a hit in Paris!
Monday, August 14, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I followed you fine till you lost your rocker in the last paragraph... now why did you have to bring up Kkkkkaran and the poor orphan when you were giving perfectly good reviews :)
I like the para on generalizations. Somewhat similar to what I read in NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming). Our mind maps inaccurate picture of the world, ignoring unnecessary information and retaining what it considers important. This definitely leads to generalizations. Indeed such generalizations are important for survival.
But what is this KANK stuff. I just now watched the movie and I really enjoyed it. Definitely it does not belong to genre of great movies but so what? It’s entertaining and well directed. Is it really so important to be always rational? Isn’t it fun being stupid at times? What is wrong in escaping to the surreal world if it gives pleasure to our senses?
One of your best posts ...hats off ... will be back for a detailed comment.. and kkk uhahhahaahhhaa that was soooooooooooo funny....
me planning to get some online free downloadof the movie i don't ahve the patience to sit in a cinema theatre and watch for 3 long hours
Bravo Kirthi... Very well written (as always) But I loved ur scathing attack on KKKKKK-a-run Jowhar... I just got to download the movie and watch it... and it suks big-time.. if K3G was crap, this is crappier... And as u ritely said..he'll make money but its a waste of time n money for all those who spend their hard earned ruppee/dollar/yen to watch the truck load of **** !!
neways.. njoi :-)
SP,
Yes I know. But with every channel on TV flashing the promos, it simply psyched me up. Of course I never tire of Mr. K. Isn't he my favorite punching bag after all!
Mohit,
Yeah perhaps that's a point of view, but somehow I have this allergy for things that are unreal. Like Vc and SP here know, I despise fantasies and the unreal world. One day I'll probably get down to writing a post on that!
Further, K movies and of course K serials on TV don't even like it to be labelled as unreal. What gets worse is, the senseless public in our nation wants to emulate such opulence! I mean ever since DDLJ there has been a glut of clothes, goodies, jewellery and other worthless parphernelia straight out of the movies. K and K don't sell just movies, they are selling us lifestyles: and lifestyles a normal guy on the street can't really afford. Ever watched a really rich guy in any of Mr. K's stuff actually sit down and work till he feels good and has a good night's sleep? Ever watched him earn those millions to buy that Lumborghini? Even Mr. LK Mittal can't afford to spend his days doing Bhangra in his lavishly done living room. So what are we dreaming of?
Vc,
Yeah I am waiting for your loos comments!
Enigma,
You are wasting bandwidth!! Just joking!
Karthik,
Can't understand why you watched it in the first place!
Simple... For the pleasure of watchin a big budget movie on the 2nd day after its world-wide release, sitting in US, without spening a single cent !!! :-P
hmm, not exactly a K Jo fan, but would panning his movies be a generalisation or blanket rule? :)
Karthik,
Waste of time according to me: Could have slept or watched a rerun of Tom and Jerry.
Manuscrypts,
Aaah I was wishing that someone would ask that question. Well statistically I can generalize and say that all of K Jo's movies are unrealistic. But since the sample space is a bit small at present, we cannot make it a blanket rule and trash him entirely.
Post a Comment